Apr 21, 2011
Apr 18, 2011
Over the last 12 months, the momentum behind HTML5 has continued to build, with application developers, browser makers and hardware vendors fully embracing and supporting the web of the future. Consumers have started to embrace HTML5 as well, especially as more users understand the benefits and potential that HTML5 can mean for the future.
Let’s look at some of the aspects of HTML5 that are already making their mark on web app development.
Better Typography and Custom Fonts
The Web Open Font Format, or WOFF, might technically be part of the HTML5 specification, but WOFF, SVG and the CSS3 @font-face specification are all commonly used additions to HTML5.
The adoption of web fonts, whether it’s using WOFF, services like Fonts.com, Typekit or the Google Web Font API is increasing at a rapid pace. This development gives content creators, brands and developers a way to better express and control the most important part of an app or website — the text — without having to rely on images or Flash implementations that don’t always work well for translated text or with search engines.
Since first highlighting this trend last year, the number of web apps that support custom fonts using Google, Typekit, Fonts.com or any number of other solutions has only increased. We expect this to continue, especially as adoption of the latest and greatest web browsers continues to grow.
Frameworks, Boilerplates and Toolkits
Last year, Paul Irish and Divya Manian introduced HTML5 Boilerplate to the world.
Over the last seven months, the project has exploded and grown in both scope and support. As we said last year, HTML5 Boilerplate is not a framework. Instead, it’s a template that can be modified by developers for their own use.
HTML5 Boilerplate 1.0 was released on March 21, 2011 with support for optimized build scripts, a custom boilerplate builder, and perhaps most excitingly for app developers — support for lighttpd, Google App Engine and NodeJS, as well as old favorites Apache, Nginx and IIS. The number of websites using HTML5 Boilerplate continues to grow and evolve.
Examples in the Wild
When Google launched its Chrome Web Store last December, it was one of the best showcases of what HTML5 web apps could offer users.
Over the last few months, more apps have been added to the store and more companies have started to optimize or rewrite their web apps specifically with HTML5.
TweetDeck is one of the most popular Twitter clients on the desktop and is revered by users. Chrome TweetDeck (or ChromeDeck) was one of the big standouts last winter, and it continues to set a high standard for what users can expect from a web application. It’s also the most popular app in the Chrome Web Store.
Earlier this month, TweetDeck announced the limited beta for its TweetDeck Web product. Built using HTML5, TweetDeck Web takes the core of the TweetDeck Chrome app and applies it to other platforms and browsers. The goal is to make the TweetDeck experience browser- and device-agnostic, and it is part of TweetDeck’s broader strategy approaching mobile and desktop apps.
Creative web app company Aviary introduced Feather, its HTML5 Photo Editor, last year. Feather isn’t only a lightweight image editor with lots of cool effects. It can be seamlessly embedded into other web apps to give additional functionality to developers who don’t have time or money to create their own solutions.
In April, Aviary announced its plans to open up its Effects API to web and mobile developers. This will allow developers to easily add effects and filters, auto-correct photos and create thumbnails or quick crops without needing user interaction.
The Future is Bright
I firmly believe that we will continue to see the worlds of web applications and desktop apps converge. It’s already happened with email, chat and social communication — the next step is to make it viable for data processing, multimedia and, ultimately, web development itself.
HTML5 is going to play a big role in enabling web developers do more with pure web apps, without needing to rely on third-party plugins or extensions. As browsers become better attuned and optimized for the evolving HTML standard, the opportunities will only increase.
Apr 15, 2011
Now the question is did India lose those matches because of Sachin? Well the idea does not seem to have the logic. What more do you ask a batsman than a century in an ODI. So let’s look at Sachin’s performances in these matches. He has an average of 138 runs in the matches that we have lost at strike rateof 95%. Well compared to the whooping averageof 207.7 at a strike rate of 103 in the matches that he hit a century and won a 138 seems to be a little faded out but I would give absolve him of the count that he has played slow or was playing for his hundred.
If we look at those matches individually we will be able to conclude further.
So here are the stats from the matches that Sachin made a century but the team lost the match. There are 12 of these oddities and here is the date from those matches. Of the 12 matches 7 matches were situations where India made scores more than 275, which is a generally considered a winning score in a typical ODI, but India lost the games. Either the opposition played extremely well or our bowlers just did not raise to the level. Interestingly in all the matches that we lost after Sachin made a century, his contribution to the net total of the game is around 45%, it all gives us an insight into how the rest of the batsman played the game.
|Match||Sachin Score||Balls Faced||team score||Sachins contribution|
1. 137 off 137 balls with 8 fours & 5 sixes.
- India v Sri Lanka.
- Wills World Cup – 24th match, Group A.
- ODI no. 1070 | 1995/96 season.
- Played at Feroz Shah Kotla, Delhi.
- 2 March 1996 (50-over match).
- Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 8 balls remaining).
India finished the 50 overs for 271/3. Only other dependable score was from Mohd. Azharuddin(72 off 80 balls). Mr Manoj Prabhakar had brilliant bowling figures of 4-0-47-0. He opened he bowling for India, he also opened batting innings and scored 7 off 36 balls.
2. 100 off 111 balls with 9 fours & 1 six.
- India v Pakistan
- Singer Cup – 3rd match
- ODI no. 1091 | 1995/96 season
- Played at The Padang, Singapore (neutral venue)
- 5 April 1996 (50-over match)
- Pakistan won by 8 wickets (with 30 balls remaining) (revised target)
India was all out for 226 in 47.1 overs. Sachin Tendulkar was stumped out at India’s score of 186/4. Five of the Indian batsmen did not cross the single digit score barrier. And only two others managed to score more than 20 runs. Pakistan had a reduced target due to rains.
3. 110 off 138 balls with 5 fours & 1 six.
- Sri Lanka v India
- Singer World Series – 2nd match
- ODI no. 1106 | 1996 season
- Played at R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo
- 28 August 1996 – day/night (50-over match)
- Sri Lanka won by 9 wickets (with 34 balls remaining)
Again the Indian score was 226 but for 5 wickets in 50 overs. Out of seven batsmen who came to crease, only Azharuddin managed to get past 20 runs score. Sachin performed with balls too with figures of 6-0-29-1, the second most economical bowler of the innings. Azhar deployed seven bowlers, out of which two had bowled with economy rate of more than 7 per over.
4. 143 off 131 balls with 9 fours & 5 sixes.
- Australia v India
- Coca-Cola Cup – 6th match
- ODI no. 1325 | 1997/98 season
- Played at Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium (neutral venue)
- 22 April 1998 – day/night (50-over match)
- Australia won by 26 runs (revised target)
India, chasing under the milky flood lights of Sharjah, had to over past New Zealand’s Net Run Rate to qualify for the finals. The complete world stood still to witness Sachin’s this innings. When Sachin’s innings ended India was 242/5 in 43 overs. Target was 276 to win or 237 to qualify for finals in 46 overs. India with the help of wonderful innings from VVS Laxman & Kanitkar made a massive score 8 runs in the final 3 overs.
5. 101 off 140 balls with 3 fours & 1 six.
- India v Sri Lanka
- Coca-Cola Champions Trophy – 1st match
- ODI no. 1640 | 2000/01 season
- Played at Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium (neutral venue)
- 20 October 2000 – day/night (50-over match)
- Sri Lanka won by 5 wickets (with 37 balls remaining)
India scored 224/8 in 50 overs with 4 single digit scorers and 4 scorers with double digits but less than 20 runs. SL got 225/in 43.5, Sachin also bowled 5-0-22-0, better economy rate than 4 other Indian bowlers of the inning.
6. 146 off 153 balls with 15 fours & 2 sixes.
- India v Zimbabwe
- Zimbabwe in India ODI Series – 3rd ODI
- ODI no. 1658 | 2000/01 season
- Played at Barkatullah Khan Stadium, Jodhpur
- 8 December 2000 (50-over match)
- Zimbabwe won by 1 wicket (with 1 ball remaining)
India finished with 283/8 in 50 overs. Sachin ended his marathon as the 8th wicket down for India at 235/8 in 46.3 overs. Ajit Agarkar and Zaheer Khan together rocketed innings with 48 runs in last 3.3 overs. If you do some elementary maths, you will figure out that 89 was the total score which rest of the eight great top order batsmen scored against the World class Zimbabwean bowling attack. Second Highest scorer was Zaheer Khan with 32. Sachin also got 6-0-35-1.
7. 101 off 129 balls with 9 fours.
- South Africa v India
- Standard Bank Triangular Tournament – 1st match
- ODI no. 1752 | 2001/02 season
- Played at New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg
- 5 October 2001 – day/night (50-over match)
- South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
India managed 279/5 in 50 overs with Saurav Ganguly’s 127 off 126 balls and Sachin Tendulkar’s efforts. No other Indian batsmen crossed 20 runs mark, highlighting 1 run knocks from Rahul Dravid. Extras conceded by the South African team were the third highest contributor in Indian score.
8. 141 off 135 balls with 17 fours & 1 six.
- Pakistan v India
- India in Pakistan ODI Series – 2nd ODI
- ODI no. 2114 | 2003/04 season
- Played at Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium
- 16 March 2004 – day/night (50-over match)
- Pakistan won by 12 runs
While on the chase of 329 runs, India was 317 all out in 48.4 overs. Except Sachin, Indian innings starred 2 ducks, 2 single digit scores and 4 double-digit but less than 20 scores. Second highest contributor to Indian score was the Extras by Pakistani team.
9. 123 off 130 with 12 fours & 2 sixes.
- India v Pakistan
- Pakistan in India ODI Series – 4th ODI
- ODI no. 2238 | 2004/05 season
- Played at Sardar Patel Stadium, Motera, Ahmedabad
- 12 April 2005 (50-over match)
- Pakistan won by 3 wickets (with 0 balls remaining)
India finished at 315/6 in 48 overs. Except Dhoni(47 off 64 balls) no other significant score. Extras were again the third highest contributor. Top 3 Indian bowlers, Balaji, Nehra & Zahir, together facilitated 188 runs in their spell of 26 overs. Sachin bowled 6-0-36-1.
10. 100 off 113 with 10 fours & 1 six.
- Pakistan v India
- India in Pakistan ODI Series – 1st ODI
- ODI no. 2324 | 2005/06 season
- Played at Arbab Niaz Stadium, Peshawar
- 6 February 2006 (50-over match)
- Pakistan won by 7 runs (D/L method)
Indian innings completed at 328 all out in 49.4 overs. Irfan Pathan & MS Dhoni scored 65 & 68 runs respectively. Sachin was LBWed at 305/5 in 45 overs. India managed only 23 runs in last 5 overs costing 5 more wickets. Sreesanth conceded 75 runs from his 10 overs. Pakistan won by D/L method.
11. 141 not out off 148 with 13 fours & 5 sixes.
- India v West Indies
- DLF Cup – 2nd match
- ODI no. 2414 | 2006/07 season
- Played at Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur (neutral venue)
- 14 September 2006 – day/night (50-over match)
- West Indies won by 29 runs (D/L method)
India amassed 309/5 in 50 overs. Sachin Tendulkar was not out and Pathan was the only other batsman to score more than 50.
12. 175 off 141 balls with 19 fours & 4 sixes.
- India v Australia
- Australia in India ODI Series – 5th ODI
- ODI no. 2923 | 2009/10 season
- Played at Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad
- 5 November 2009 – day/night (50-over match)
- Australia won by 3 runs
India was chasing a huge target of 351 in 50 overs which was set by Australia. Indian pace attack conceded 220 runs in just 28 overs while bowling first. India began the chase in style with Sachin & Sehwag. And in the end India fall short of just 3 runs getting all out on 347 in 49.4 overs. Except Sachin Tendulkar, it was just Suresh Raina who scored past 50. Seven of the Indian batsmen returned to pavilion with single digit score.
With those individual match statistics I more than convinced that there is no co-relation between Sachin centuries and India losses. But it brings out the irrefutable fact of any team sport; one man cannot save a game if the rest of the team fails. End of it cricket is a team sport a game played by 11 to win a game and one man cannot influence the result of the game. He might be able to single-handedly save some games but not all the games.
By the way I did not know that Sachin averages a 207 in the games that he made a century and India has won….i don’t think anyone has that average in the history of the game. That is another record that will take a long time to break…..